briley5678briley
contestada

Which arguments were made against President Bush's decision in 2003 to invade Iraq? Choose all answers that are correct. A. It had not been proven that Iraq had acquired weapons of mass destruction. B. Iraq was a democratic nation that brought stability to the Middle East. C. If attacked, Saddam Hussein would launch nuclear missiles at the United States. D. Saddam Hussein had not attacked the U.S. and had no connection to al-Qaeda.

Respuesta :

Answer: d was right for me

Explanation:

On the test :)

marvineetesh3

The argument that were made against President Bush's decision in 2003 to invade Iraq was that Saddam Hussein had not attacked the U.S. and had no connection to al-Qaeda.

Who was Bush?

George Walker Bush is the full name of Bush. He was an American political leader that serviced as the 43rd President of the US from 2001 to 2009.

He was a member of the Bush family and son of former president George H. W. Bush, he antecedently functioned as the 46th politician of Texas as part of the Politician Party.

President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was criticized, since Saddam Hussein had not attacked the United States and had no ties to al-Qaeda.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Learn more about the bush, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/8821891

#SPJ2

Otras preguntas