Respuesta :
According to general law, life and limb must be safeguarded. However, sometimes a limb must be severed in order to save a life; life is never judiciously given in order to save a limb. I believed that by becoming essential to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the country, otherwise unconstitutional policies might be made legal.
Right or incorrect, I avow this assumption that I made earlier. If I allowed the destruction of government, country, and Constitution totally to save slavery or any other minor issue, I could not feel that I had done everything in my power to protect the Constitution.
I prohibited General Fremont's early attempts at military emancipation because I did not view them as absolutely necessary at the time. I protested when General Cameron, who was then the secretary of war, suggested arming the blacks because I did not yet consider it to be a crucial necessity.
I prohibited it when General Hunter made an attempt at military emancipation years later because I didn't believe the time had arrived for it yet. I really and repeatedly pleaded with the Border States to support compensated emancipation in March, May, and July 1862 because I firmly believed that, absent that action, the unavoidable need for military emancipation and arming the Blacks would arise.
They declined the offer, and I was, in my opinion, driven to choose between giving up the Union and the Constitution or exerting firm control over the racial minority. I went with the latter. I chose it in the hopes that I would gain more than lose, albeit I wasn't fully sure of this.
Yours truly,
A. Lincoln
Learn more about the constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ1