Federalists argue for a separation of powers because B.The president should have more power than the other branches.
Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?
A. No single branch of government would have too much power.
B.The president should have more power than the other branches.
C.Power would be divided equally between federal and state government.
D.Trying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.
The Federalists wanted a strong government and also strong executive branch. They also did not want a bill of rights because they thought the new constitution was sufficient.
During the founding of the country, the federalists were ideologically pitted against the anti-federalists. The federalists favored a stronger central (federal) government because of the precursor to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave no strength to the national government. It couldn't tax the states and had to rely on donations from the states for funds. And also there was no central army and many feared the return of the British, which they did in the War of 1812.
Federalists argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances system created in the new Constitution protected the people. No one group could control the other two. They argue that the separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the people. Each branch represents a different aspect of the people, and because all three branches are equal, no one group can assume control over another.
Grade: 9
Subject: history
Chapter: Federalists
Keywords: Federalists
The Federalists were of the opinion that a sovereign nation would require a strong central government with financial, legislative, diplomatic and political powers. Prior to the formulation of the Constitution of India, the Articles of the Federation were formulated only on a regional basis. The country was thereby a loose confederation of states, which could declare independence any time, and thus dissolve the Union. An increase in the powers of the regional Government would thereby pose a threat to the sovereignty of the nation. The Federalists believed that it was important to clearly define the powers of the Federal Government, investing it with the rights to taxation, the right to legislation and the right to conduct foreign policy. However, matters that would require a clear knowledge of regional expertise would be vested with the State Governments.
Further Explanation:
Separation of Powers would in a way preserve the versatility of the States and prevents the Federal Government from encroaching upon the powers of the State Governments. They believed this was essential to maintain the uniqueness of the State Governments. The Federalists also demanded Separation of Powers as it would be important to prevent any one branch of the Government from becoming too powerful, and thereby assuming an authoritarian rule. The system of checks and balances was introduced so that no single government institution would become too powerful and would exercise their powers arbitrarily. The Federalists also argued that the introduction of the Bill of Rights would not be necessary, as the New Constitution had enough provisions for safeguarding and providing basic rights to all citizens of the United States.
Learn more:
1. The powers of the commander in chief of the armed forces belong to the
https://brainly.com/question/9881795
2. How were people in the middle colonies different from those in the new england and southern colonies?
https://brainly.com/question/1720656
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: The U.S. Constitution
Subject: History
Keywords:
Separation of Powers, bill of rights, rights of the federal government, power to taxation, legislative rights, foreign policy, checks and balances.
