PART B
Now, return to the Text from this until and identify textual evidence from 2 to 3 sources your claim about Julius Cesar in part a. Include these details in the table below:
• The source of your textual evidence
• The textual evidence that supports your claim
• commentary that explains your textual evidence

'Roman historian Appian lamented, “The people hoped that [Caesar] would also give them back democracy, just as Sulla had done, who had achieved a position of equal power. However, they were disappointed in this.”'

This shows Caesar was just as bad as Sulla. People were hoping that they would get back their democracy but Caesar didn't give it back much to their chagrin.

Hal Marcovitz, the Rise of Julius Caesar

"As Caesar made his way back to Rome, the Senate ordered him to disband his army. Caesar refused. Instead, on January 10 in 49 BCE, Caesar led his army in an attack on Rome."

This shows that instead of listening to the senate and following orders, he instead got things done through fear tactics.

Explanation:

jayilych4real jayilych4real · Answer 2 · 2022-03-17T14:35:39+01:00

The identification of the textual evidence from the play Julius Cesar are:

Hal Marcovitz, the Rise of Julius Caesar. He talked about the decision of Cesar not to give the Roman people democracy.
Hal Marcovitz, the Rise of Julius Caesar. Cesar successfully made use of fear tactics and disobeyed the Senate and attacked Rome.

What is Textual Evidence?

This refers to the validating evidence which can be gotten from a text that backs up an earlier claim about something.

Here, we can see that Julius Cesar was a legendary Roman leader who was widely loved and feared in Rome and beyond but did not give his people democracy back which made them disappointed.

Read more about textual evidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/375033