In Isaac Asimov's "The Machine That Won the War," the perspectives of John Henderson (Chief Programmer), Max Jablonsky (Chief Interpreter of Multivac), and Lamar Swift (a military captain and executive director of the Solar Federation) initially leaned towards similar conclusions.
Jablonsky, Henderson, and Swift were assigned to create a machine to win a war. After many complex programming, the machine was produced to win the war. When the war ended, the three scientists discussed the outcome. The scientists initially thought that the machine won the war. Their thinking credited the machine with victory. But the complicated techniques and plans laid in a machine cannot win a war.
Later in the science fiction, Jablonsky claimed that Multivac did not win the war because Henderson admitted that he made some data changes.
Thus, despite the complex nature and great costs of the weaponry, Multivac, the final decisions about the machine's military strategies were based on coin-tossing, showing that the machine was not the hero.
Learn more about science fictions here: https://brainly.com/question/19972791 and https://brainly.com/question/18604686
