A scientist claimed that he radiocarbon dated a fossilized skull of a dinosaur and found it to be about 63 million years old. Do you support his claim? Provide at least one scientifically based reason why you do or do not support the claim.

Question

mwilliams04 mwilliams04

18-12-2020
Chemistry

contestada

A scientist claimed that he radiocarbon dated a fossilized skull of a dinosaur and found it to be about 63 million years old. Do you support his claim? Provide at least one scientifically based reason why you do or do not support the claim.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

_______ are created under ________, similar to how you create individual files within a broader file folder

The Voting Rights Act gave the government power to enforce which amendment?

Why does coca cola taste better at jimmy johns reddit?

what is barack obamas first name

Which learning theory is based on associative learning?

Which environmental consequences is most often associated with obtaining energy from fossil fuels

The price s of a sweater is reduced by 25% for a sale. After the sale, the reduced price was increased by 20%. What is the final price of the sweater?

From who did the wright brothers learn their mechanical skills

Can someone please help me on number 3? (Number 4 too if you want to be named the brainliest)

Which of these words is an adjective that can be used to make a sentence more descriptive?

1012787108 1012787108 · Answer 1 · 2020-12-18T19:53:00+01:00

Answer:Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning - and more than some could tolerate. After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings. Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors. When the authors inquired, they received this letter:

Explanation:

i do not own my copyrights