Answer:
(C) There are no birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older that the bird fossils but have nit yet been unearthed
Explanation:
The author's argument is based on the fact that there are no exact discovered birdlike dinosaur fossils that are more aged than bird fossils.
So, if there are birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older than the bird fossils, then this illustrates the author's conclusion.
Archeology is an ever evolving field with newer findings often leading to date shifting for artefacts. What if there are fossil remains of this bird-like species which hasn't been unearthed yet. Clearly, the author is assuming all fossil discoveries related to species have already been made.
This is true for the argument to hold. If the reverse were true - there are older birdlike dinosaurs, but we haven't found them yet - then the logic of this argument would fall apart. The fossils we currently have wouldn't reflect the true chronology