Respuesta :
Answer:
both Sue and Tessa gain 0.3; 0.50
Explanation:
Sue's production possibilities frontier:
- 70 caps
- 21 jackets
Sue's opportunity cost:
- opportunity cost of producing caps = 21 / 70 = 0.3 jackets
- opportunity cost of producing jackets = 70/21 = 3.33 caps
Tessa's production possibilities frontier:
- 50 caps
- 25 jackets
Tessa's opportunity cost:
- opportunity cost of producing caps = 25 / 50 = 0.5 jackets
- opportunity cost of producing jackets = 50/25 = 2 caps
Sue should produce caps and Tessa jackets:
total production = 70 caps (Sue) + 25 jackets (Tessa), if they trade they will both win because each specialized in producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage (lower opportunity costs). If Sue traded and received 21 jackets, she would still have 28 caps left. If Tessa traded and received 50 caps, she would still have 10 jackets left.
Sue's opportunity cost of producing a cap is 0.3 jackets
Tessa's opportunity cost of producing a cap is 0.5 jackets
Sue has a comparative advantage in the production of caps.
If Sue and Tessa each specialize in producing the good in which they have a comparative advantage, both of them gains.
Definition of opportunity cost
Opportunity cost of the next best option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.
Sue's opportunity cost of producing a cap = 21 / 70 = 0.3 jackets
Tessa's opportunity cost of producing a cap = 25 / 50 = 0.5 jackets
Comparative advantage
A person has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared to other people. When people specialise in the production of goods they have comparative advantage in, both parties in the trade benefits.
To learn more about opportunity cost, please check: brainly.com/question/13036997