Respuesta :
Answer:
1. Darla is liable to Paul. Because her activity can be considered dangerous, she is responsable for the products she manufares and their effects on health issues.
2. Paul obteained damages from Carla. Non only physical and health damages, but also emotions distress because of the fear of cancer. This is called emotional distress.
Explanation:
Darla produeced a gas of high toxicity there for she is liable for the negligence of doing so. She is responsable for the damages caused to the consumers she sells the product to. She is a comercial supplier there for responsable for the product she sells.
Paul could sue her under the statements presented. A product she sells causes health problems. This can fall aunder Actual and Proximate cause.
There is a manufacturing defect.
Darla is a pest controller and she develops fumigation gas for her use. She also sells this to her clients but some of her clients don't sell the gas as she does not follow the safety regulations. She used this gas in Albert and successfully killed the insects.
- It is due to she used the gas careless some of which entered into the building Paul and the gas made him suffer. The gas lead to a serious infection as it damaged his lungs.
- For the same Darla is to blame as the gas might have been carcinogenic. Hence she is liable for his loss. Paul may even have a chance of developing lung cancer. As her gas was toxic.
Learn more about the pest control business. She develops.
brainly.com/question/13187120.