Answer:
For years, for a variety of apparently logical reasons, cracking down on those who commit arson for profit has been a low priority for most law-enforcement agencies. Lines of jurisdiction between police and fire departments have never been clear. Other crimes have long been considered more serious. And arson cases, often lacking witnesses and hard evidence, have ben notoriously tough to prove. Nationally, the conviction rate in arson cases is less than 1 percent.
Explanation:
For a number of years, punishing people who commit arson has been a low-priority case for most law-enforcement agencies.
Arson is known as fire damage. In addition, the act of arson is a serious crime when someone intentionally burns property.
Administrative procedures between the police and the fire departments have never been clear. Some crimes have long been considered extremely serious.
And arson cases, often lacking witnesses and solid evidence, are notorious for proving false. Nationally, the conviction rate for arson cases is less than 1 percent.
Thus, this is the attitude of fire and police departments and the insurance companies that represent victims of arson.
To learn more about Arson Fire refer:
https://brainly.com/question/15833585
#SPJ2
