Manufacturing Company was a very conscientious company to their employees and to the town they were located in. They provided jobs to needy workers and helped out with community projects. Their manufacturing process caused severe vibrations, which Manufacturing Company was fully aware of, and they did everything they could to minimize the vibrations. However, Mulligan, who owned a house right next to Manufacturing Company, suffered severe structural damage to his house as a result of the vibrations caused by Manufacturing Company. Mulligan informed Manufacturing Company of the structural damage to his home, and Manufacturing Company apologized, but said they had already done everything they could to minimize the vibrations, and they continued to operate as normal. No other nearby houses suffered such damage. If Mulligan brings a suit in private nuisance, what is the probable result?
a) Judgment for Manufacturing Company, because they took all reasonable steps to prevent the vibrations.
b) Judgment for Manufacturing Company, because no other neighbors suffered any comparable damages.
c) Judgment for Mulligan, because he informed Manufacturing Company that the vibrations were causing damage to his house.
d) Judgment for Mulligan, because he suffered unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of his land.