Ellie enters into a contact with Richard. Under the contract Ellie is giving Richard her solid gold crown in exchange for Richard's favorite horse. The crown is worth far more than the horse. If the parties end up in court over the contract the fact that the crown is worth far more than the horse will likely:

A. render the contract unenforceable because of the inadequacy of consideration.
B. lead the court to order Richard to pay Ellie money to compensate her for the unequal consideration exchanged under the contract.
C. lead the court to engage in a lengthy process aimed at making sure each side received consideration of at least roughly equivalent cash value under the contract.
D. not matter because court's do not generally concern themselves with the adequacy of the consideration given by parties to a contract.